Archives February 2022

SHOULDER DYSTOCIA: COMMON AREA OF PERINATAL LITIGATION

In this blog, I’ll be reviewing some causes of perinatal litigation, the importance of providing care according to current standards of care, ways to mitigate perinatal liability exposure, common allegations specific to alleged injuries resulting from shoulder dystocia, and current standards of care intended to decrease professional liability exposure, and reduce the risk of iatrogenic (relating to injury or illness caused by medical examination or treatment) maternal and neonatal injury.  

Causes of Perinatal Litigation:  Findings suggest that allegations against nurses, certified nurse midwives, physicians, and/or institutions often result from a lack of knowledge or commitment to practice in accordance to current standards, guidelines, and evidence.  In other instances, care is rendered according to personal experiences, preferences, and history of practice over a long period of time during which the provider has not experienced an adverse outcome.  Moving toward a science based clinical practice environment, rather than “that’s the way we’ve always done it” is a challenge to promoting safe care (AWHONN, 2014; AWHONN, 2021).  

Ways to Mitigate Perinatal Liability Exposure:  Certainly, all adverse events are not preventable, however, practices inconsistent with current standards of care offer opportunity for the plaintiff to demonstrate a breach of the standard of care (AWHONN, 2021).  One key way to reduce liability exposure is to provide care consistent with current standards of care.  

Shoulder dystocia is a common area of perinatal litigation with common allegations including:

  • Failure to accurately predict the risk of shoulder dystocia
  • Failure to diagnose labor abnormalities
  • Failure to appropriately initiate shoulder dystocia corrective maneuvers
  • Failure to prioritize delivery of posterior arm
  • Failure to perform cesarean birth
  • Application of forceps or vacuum at high station, or continued application without evidence of fetal descent, resulting in shoulder dystocia
  • Application of fundal pressure during shoulder dystocia, further affecting the shoulder and delaying birth, thereby resulting in maternal-fetal injuries

Standards, Guidelines, Recommendations:

  • Although there are a number of known risk factors, shoulder dystocia cannot be accurately predicted or prevented (ACOG, 2017)
  • When shoulder dystocia is suspected, the McRoberts maneuver should be attempted first because it is a simple, logical, and effective technique (ACOG, 2017)
  • In cases where the McRoberts maneuver and suprapubic pressure are unsuccessful, delivery of the posterior arm can be considered as the next maneuver to manage shoulder dystocia (ACOG, 2017, AWHONN, 2021)
  • Simulation exercises and shoulder dystocia protocols are recommended to improve team communication and maneuver use because this may reduce the incidence of brachial plexus palsy associated with shoulder dystocia (ACOG, 2017)
  • The Joint Commission’s Sentinel Event Alert, Preventing Infant Death and Injury during Delivery, recommends conducting periodic drills for obstetric emergencies such as shoulder dystocia (AWHONN, 2021)

P.S. Comment and share your experience with a shoulder dystocia litigation. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the case?

References

Simpson K.R. et al. (2021). AWHONN Perinatal Nursing, 5th ed. Wolters Kluwer

Simpson K.R. & Creehan P.A. (2014). AWHONN Perinatal Nursing, 4th ed. Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2017). Shoulder dystocia [Clinical Practice Bulletin #178]

Joint Commission. (2004). Preventing infant death and injury during delivery. Sentinel Event Alert Issue 30

FEBRUARY IS AMERICAN HEART MONTH

In this blog, I’ll be reviewing the statistics specific to mortality associated with heart disease, the monetary cost of heart disease in the United States, risk factors for heart disease, as well as available “tool kits” for the management of heart disease.

Prevalence in the U.S.:  Approximately 659,000 people in the U.S. die from heart disease annually, accounting for 1 in every 4 deaths.  Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the U.S. (Department of Health and Human Services (2022).

Monetary Cost: Heart disease cost the U.S. approximately $363 billion annually from 2016 – 2017.  This included the cost of health care services, medications, and lost productivity due to death (Department of Health and Human Services (2022).

Risk Factors: High blood pressurehigh blood cholesterol, and smoking are key risk factors for heart disease.  There are other medical conditions and lifestyle choices that can also put people at a higher risk for heart disease, including, but not limited to:

Management by Standardization of Evidence Based Practice and Use of “Tool Kits”: It is recommended that providers make a commitment to following the most current clinical guidelines for the management of high blood pressure control to ensure that care is cost-effective, evidence based, and accessible and controlled amongst all populations. The use of the following “tool kits”, in conjunction with The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Control Hypertension is a recommended approach to implementing protocols, and using data to improve health outcomes.   

  1. Lifestyle changes   

Eat Smart, Move More!

Recipes for a Heart-Healthy Lifestyleexternal icon

2. Health equity

Alliance for the Million Hearts® Campaign Partner Toolkit

Reducing Out-of-Pocket Costs for Medications

Grady Implementation Guide

3. Self-measured Blood Pressure Monitoring

Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring

Self-Management Support and Education

4. Medication Adherence

Pharmacy: Collaborative Practice Agreements to Enable Collaborative Drug Therapy Management

Improving Medication Adherence Among Patients with Hypertension

Community Pharmacists and Medication Therapy Management

5. Standardizing and Improving Patient Care

Million Hearts® Hypertension Control Change Package, Second Edition

Implementing Clinical Decision Support Systems

Team-Based Care: Promoting Team-Based Care to Improve High Blood Pressure Control

6. Identifying Patients with Hypertension

Undiagnosed Hypertensionexternal icon

The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Control Hypertension focuses on Standardization of patient care, minimization of variation in care delivery, prompt medication initiation for the management of high blood pressure and high cholesterol, standardization of timely patient follow-up, and reinforcement of lifestyle counseling and referrals. All members of the clinical care team are empowered to engage in the management of the patient to ensure a positive outcome

References

Department of Health and Human Services (2022), Heart Disease, Tools and Training. https://www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/tools_training.htm

Department of Health and Human Services (2022), National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion , Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention

Department of Health and Human Services (2020), The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Control Hypertension.

https://www.cdc.gov/bloodpressure/docs/Surgeon_General_HTN_Control_Health_Professionals.pdf